By Nikko Dizon
Philippine Daily Inquirer
MANILA, Philippines—Should the ongoing conflict in Sabah be tackled by the Bangsamoro Transition Commission?
An MILF negotiator from the indigenous community says not at this early stage of the TransCom, which formally began its work to create the Bangsamoro Basic Law that signals the peace deal between the government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), which had led a secessionist movement for the past decades.
Datu Antonio Kinoc, a member of the MILF negotiating panel, cited on Wednesday a B’laan tribal saying that one doesn’t put two glass bottles together or else one might break.
“Instead, we handle the bottles one after the other,” said Kinoc, the MILF indigenous people’s representative who is part of the B’laan tribe based in South Cotabato.
While not part of the Transition Commission, Kinoc listened to the barrage of questions thrown by the media at the 15 members of the commission led by MILF chief negotiator Mohagher Iqbal, mainly about what the Bangsamoro Transition Committee, in crafting the Basic Law, could do to help resolve the long-standing Sabah issue.
It appeared that none of the commission’s answers, including Iqbal, could satisfy the reporters’ questions about the Sabah being claimed by the Sulu Sultanate, a major stakeholder in the Bangsamoro community.
The Sulu Sultanate revived its long dormant claim over Sabah, with the Royal Security Forces led by Raja Muda Agbimuddin Kiram arriving in the town of Lahad Datu last February.
The gunbattle between the Sultanate’s followers and the Malayian security forces has resulted in a number of deaths and arrests among both Filipino and Malaysian citizens.
There are also claims by displaced persons who have fled Sabah of human rights abuses by Malaysian authorities.
Therefore, why should Sabah be an issue alienated from the peace talks?
TransCom members answered that the issue of Sabah has not been ignored.
But commission member Hussein Munoz, the deputy chief of staff of the Bangsamoro Islamic Armed Forces (BIAF) conceded that the Sabah issue was a “very difficult question to answer.”
“But we have not yet crafted the law. So as far as Sabah is concerned, as the chairman (Iqbal) mentioned a while ago, it is not an issue in the peace negotiations,” Munoz said.
He added: “It is a matter that involves a
bilateral issue between the Philippines and Malaysian governments. It is
not an issue in the peace negotiation.”
Iqbal also stressed that the task of the
committee is based on what is mentioned in the Bangsamoro Framework
Agreement, the so-called blueprint for the peace deal between the
government and the MILF.
Lawyer Johaira Wahab, the youngest member
of the Transition Committee, gave the assurance that the group would not
be working in a “vacuum.”
“It is not the intention of this body to
ignore the realities on the ground. Of course, consultations will
happen. We will talk to the communities, those who will be affected by
the law. The people in the island provinces of Sulu, Tawi-Tawi and
Basilan will be included in those consultations and all of these issues
will be considered there,” Wahab said.
She added: “The reason why we are very
careful in handling the Sabah issue is because this is the Bangsamoro
transition Commission. This is not the Department of Foreign Affairs.”
“As much as we would want to comment on our
personal stand on the issue of Sabah that is beyond our mandate as a
group, that is beyond our mandate based on our personal appointments to
the Transition Commission,” she said.
Beyond Sabah and back to the concerns on
the peace deal between the government and the MILF, Iqbal said in his
opening remarks that the MILF “views the Commission as its first initial
partnership with the (government).”
“As such, it shall endeavor to reach
consensus with representatives of the government on major decisions in
the course of its work. We shall not work against each other but instead
work with each other to address the Moro Problem, or more correctly,
the Moro Question,” Iqbal said.
For her part, government chief negotiator
Miriam Coronel-Ferrer said that despite the many challenges faced by
both panels, no one has been “defeated” and that with the Transition
Committee, “We have moved forward.”
At the press conference, Iqbal stressed the
need to finish the three remaining annexes on power sharing,
normalization, and wealth sharing so that the Transition Committee would
be able to discuss “substantive issues.”
But like Ferrer, he is optimistic that the
annexes would be signed soon, following a sudden postponement of the
37th exploratory talks reportedly because President Aquino first wanted
to review the three annexes.
The MILF said the negotiations could no longer afford any delay.
But Iqbal said he remained confident because “the gains we have achieved so far are really tremendous.”
“We see that we have partner in government in the person of the President himself…. We need to surmount the obstacles,” he said.
Asked if the Transition Commission would see the need to amend the Constitution, Iqbal said the issue “cannot be settled now.”
“The position of government is that the
flexibility of the current Constitution will accommodate the (provisions
in the peace accord). But the MILF position is the current Constitution
of the Philippines requires an amendment. But we will move forward and
time will come we will see if there is a need to amend the Constitution
or not,” Iqbal said.
No comments:
Post a Comment