Friday, May 25, 2012

As shoal tensions rise, US attack sub docks at Subic Bay


May 18, 2012


GMA News  
File photo of the the US Navy's USS North Carolina (SSN777) attack submarine.
One of the stealthiest submarines in the world, the USS North Carolina, docked in Subic Bay on Sunday, the US Pacific Command (Pacom) said.
According to Pacom, the Virginia class fast attack submarine’s Philippine visit was part of the vessel’s Western Pacific deployment.
“The crew is proud of our recent contributions as part of our country’s commitment to maintaining freedom of navigation, peace and stability in the region,” said Cmdr. Richard Rhinehart, the North Carolina’s commanding officer.
File photo of the the US Navy’s USS North Carolina (SSN777) attack submarine.
In a text message on Tuesday, Foreign Affairs spokesperson Asec. Raul Hernandez confirmed the sub’s Philippine presence. “USS North Carolina… [is] in Subic Bay, on routine ship replenishment.”
Hernandez noted the submarine will be in the Philippines until May 19.
“North Carolina is one of the stealthiest, most technologically advanced submarines in the world,” Pacom claimed.
With a crew of 133, the submarine measures more than 350 feet long and weighs more that 7,800 tons when submerged.
“She brings to the region the capability to conduct the full spectrum of potential submarine missions including anti-submarine warfare, anti-surface ship warfare, strike, naval special warfare involving special operations forces, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, and mine warfare,” Pacom noted.
Master chief Jon Consford said the visit constitutes “rest and relaxation.”
“Everyone is looking forward to some good liberty, rest and relaxation during our port visit here in Subic Bay… The crew has worked hard and developed tremendously as a team over the last five and a half months,” he said in the same Pacom report.
US presence escalates PHL-China tension–CPP
Meanwhile, amid the increasingly tense standoff between Beijing and Manila in Panatag Shoal, the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) said in a statement on Sunday that US military presence escalates the tension between the two Asian countries.
“It is US military buildup… in the Asia-Pacific that is pushing China to further aggressiveness, resulting in worsening territorial conflicts and stoking diplomatic tensions between China and the Philippines,” the statement read.
Though the group backed the assertion of Philippine sovereignty over Panatag Shoal, it noted that the country should not lean on the US for military aid.
“In the past, the conflicts in the South China Sea have never been a source of great tension between the Philippines and China,” they said.
“Without the presence and interference of the US, claimant countries, including China, have been able to work together with each other with the aim of resolving the conflicts through diplomacy and negotiations,” CPP claimed.
Amid the dispute, the US and the Philippines issued a joint statement on April 30 reinstating the alliance “undergirding regional peace, security, and prosperity. — VS/KG/HS, GMA News
- – - – - – - – - – - – - –
RELATED STORY:

Second US nuclear sub cancels port visit in Subic

Source: Subic Times
USS North Carolina being assisted by tugboats after it arrived here in Subic Sunday. Photo by David Bayarong
SUBIC BAY Freeport:Another US submarine which was supposed to port here in Subic has suddenly cancelled its schedule.
Sources said that USS Tucon, a nuclear powered attack submarine by the United States was supposed to dock in Subic’s port on the 19th but suddenly cancelled.
The cancelation came 2 days after USS North Carolina was spotted docked at Alava pier here and caught the attention of local and foreign media after www.subictimes.com posted its picture Tuesday.
USS North Carolina being assisted by tugboats after it arrived here in Subic Sunday. Photo by David Bayarong
The arrival came as dispute between the Philippines and China continue regarding Scarborough Shoal which is located in the province of Zambales.
Subic Bay Freeport is located at the edge of Zambales and is only 10 towns away from Masinloc which is the nearest town in the Philippines to the disputed shoal.
Philippine Navy spokesperson Lieutenant Colonel Omar Tonsay said that the US submarine which arrived in Subic Sunday had nothing to do with the matter (China-Philippine standoff).
Meanwhile, handful members of the Kilusan para sa Pambansang Demokrasya (KPD) on Wednesday staged a lighting rally in front of the main gate of Subic Bay Freeport against the arrival of USS North Carolina.
KPD also called on the government to scrap the Visiting Forces Agreement between US and the Philippines.
“We don’t need the help of anyone to protect our territory particularly in Scarborough Shoal,” Lea Montemayor of KPD said.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Corona, China and Hungry Filipinos


May 18, 2012


GLIMPSES
By Jose Ma. Montelibano
There is no debate that the Ombudsman’s entry into the Impeachment Trial of Chief Justice Rene Corona has become the hottest news in town. And the expected presence of Rene Corona as the main witness of the Defense next week is keeping the suspense high. Although the Chief Justice has already been judged by most of the people, the big majority concluding him guilty and the small minority still holding out on his innocence, the drama of seeing him being questioned and answering both accusers and senator judges is keenly awaited. Even the delicate situation confronting us in Scarborough Shoal has never taken front and center stage because the Corona trial and the Ombudsman’s revelations of dollar accounts grabbed the public attention.
I cannot blame the people for being riveted to the Corona trial. It has been a long, long time since a big fish has stood trial. The last impeachment trial was against a sitting president, Joseph Estrada. In that trial which also focused on corruption, banks also figured powerfully, especially bank officer Clarissa Ocampo and the Jose Velarde account. During Gloria Arroyo’s presidency, there was an aborted investigation about her husband, Mike Arroyo, and a Jose Pidal account. When Rene Corona takes the stand, takes a last stand to save himself and the reputation that will live after him, he should be ready to open everything – which he can do by authorizing all banks to open his accounts and transactions. Anything less will not negate the verdict of guilty that is already in people’s minds.
The Scarborough issue has brought to the surface the dynamics of two superpowers, America and China. I believe that China made a gambit to deliver a message to the Philippines, that being submissive or pliant to US interests in the region using our country is unacceptable. I believe that it was always unacceptable but China bided its time before making a direct move to disrupt the configuration of US-Philippine relations. Today, China may believe that it has reached parity in the arms race and actually moving more strongly in the economic field. Today, China sends that message to the United States through the Philippines, or through what it is doing to the Philippines.
Of course, the United States, while saying it is not taking sides in a dispute over Scarborough Shoal, conducts military exercises with the Armed Forces of the Philippines and allows a most modern submarine to surface and be photographed. America recognizes the growing strategic importance of Asia and it knows it does not have enough influence in a region dominated by China and Muslims. Where can America go after its bases in Japan are being dismantled? It still has South Korea but understands that these are not enough. The Muslim region is closer to the Philippines, the only other country where the possibility of hosting US bases or a revolving armed presence via the Visiting Forces Agreement.
China wanted us to negotiate directly with them through bilateral diplomacy talks. We had no need to so it created an issue, a delicate issue. That is why I term it a gambit. How else can China send us, and the United States, a clear message in indirect terms? But it is still a gambit because it pushes Filipinos nearer to America than farther away. Perhaps, China though we would react in fear and quickly negotiate. Instead, China is triggering patriotism to become alive when it was largely asleep. That patriotism is not enough to stand up against China, but it can still be heated more if China ups the ante. China, though, is part of a global village, and it is also very careful about bullying because the ASEAN will feel bullied, too.
The Corona Impeachment Trail and the Scarborough Shoal conflict have covered an issue which to me is even more important. Unfortunately, it does not have enough importance to the Filipino people except those who are directly affected by it. I am referring to hunger, why so many continue to be plagued by it, and why administration after administration refuses to confront it. Why do we pit Catholics against Catholics in the RH Bill, pit the Executive against the Judiciary and draw the Legislative into the fray called impeachment, and even pit Filipinos against the Chinese but are afraid to confront the worst situation that can happen to a people, to a nation? Why can we not answer why millions of our people experience hunger, why can we not condemn hunger by feeding the hungry, why can we not ensure that hunger should not be the problem of Filipinos?
The CCT is useless against hunger, maybe because it is not hunger that it wishes to confront. Maybe it is education, maybe it is politics, but definitely, it is not hunger. Unless there will be serious changes in perspective and operational design. I don’t expect that, however. Hunger incidence does not bother Filipino enough unless they are among the twenty million that confronts the possibility of hunger everyday. It does not bother the Church enough, it does not bother the State enough. We get more bothered by other concerns as though the hunger of millions of our fellow Filipinos is not worth our time, talent and resources.
I have written about this same pain and fear of millions of our people several times in several years. But I must admit that I have not made a dent, that I have not convinced others to be concerned enough to act. There were a few who went on feeding missions because they were personal friends who wanted to show support, and I remain grateful. But millions experiencing hunger need millions to sympathize and respond.
Hunger incidence at levels Filipinos experience it is a national problem that has not merited national attention and sympathy. I can only weep for the hungry. More, though, I weep for a nation that cannot release the curse it calls on itself.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Senate locks in CJ


Corona walks out!


By Christina Mendez
The Philippine Star
MY CONSCIENCE IS CLEAR: Chief Justice Renato Corona is wheeled out of the Senate session hall after he was discharged by Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile. Corona’s camp said he suffered a hypoglycemic episode, or low blood sugar. He went to a hospital last night.
MANILA, Philippines – After hours of voicing his anguish and lashing out at his accusers almost uninterrupted, Chief Justice Renato Corona made a quick and unceremonious exit from the Senate impeachment court yesterday, but failed to leave the premises after Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile ordered the gates locked.
Corona, after excusing himself at the end of his testimony, walked briskly to the exit and disappeared in the gallery, only to reappear minutes later in a wheelchair.
“Now the Chief Justice of the Republic of the Philippines wishes to be excused,” Corona said after delivering his lengthy testimony, which was his first since the beginning of the impeachment trial four months ago.
“Please let the Chief Justice come back,” Enrile said as he ordered the sergeant-at-arms to close down the Senate premises to prevent the Chief Justice from leaving.
An indignant Enrile later gave Corona and his defense team led by former justice Serafin Cuevas a dressing down, saying the Chief Justice’s action was a show of disrespect to the impeachment court.
“I think that we did not volunteer to be the judges here. We are here by virtue of the mandate by the Filipino people, and I will tell you Mr. Counsel, I have respect for the Chief Justice, I respect the institution that he represents but I fully demand the respect for the institution that I represent,” Enrile told Cuevas who claimed to be taken by surprise himself.
Corona’s lawyers said their client did not try to leave but he had to excuse himself because he was not feeling well, reportedly after suffering from hypoglycemia or low blood sugar.
“We are not going to allow any slight, any abuse of authority against this court for as long as I am the presiding officer,” Enrile said. “If you are not going to allow your client, or he will not allow himself to be cross-examined, we will decide this case on the basis of evidence on record,” the Senate President said.
He ordered Corona to return for today’s continuation of his testimony “without postponement” despite Cuevas’ request that his client be allowed to fully recover from his condition before being required to return.
Shortly after Corona left the gallery, Cuevas told the court that the Chief Justice was not about to leave, but was “taking his medicines” and “attending to personal necessities.” This drew jeers from the crowd prompting Enrile to warn them that they would be asked to leave the chamber.
“I warn you that if you continue to be disorderly, I will ask the sergeant-at-arms to escort you out of the session hall. I hope you understand the decorum required by this court. You may do it in some other place, but not in this court,” Enrile said.
Outside the chamber, Senate security personnel pulled down the steel accordion gates at the Senate’s basement area where Corona’s car and security backup were parked.
Sources said Corona was prevented from leaving the premises as he was about to use the elevator near the senators’ lounge, where there is direct access to basement parking. Corona’s SUV and security vehicle had to navigate around the basement parking, waiting for the Chief Justice to arrive.
Stopped by security personnel at the executive lounge area, Corona was approached by his lawyers and his son-in-law doctor, as well as by Senate chief physician Dr. Mariano Blanchia. He was brought in a wheelchair to the Senate’s clinic before being escorted back under heavy security to the session hall.
Indignant Enrile
An indignant Enrile, meanwhile, asked Cuevas to explain why they let the Chief Justice leave the impeachment court even if he had not yet been discharged. Cuevas could only apologize and said there was no intention to show disrespect.
“Wag naman kaming babastusin (Please don’t show us disrespect),” Enrile said. “Hindi ko papayagan na papabayaan ng husgado na ito na babastusin ng sinuman (I will never allow this court to be maligned by anyone).
“We allowed him to narrate his defense… if he does not want to be cross-examined, you know the consequences of that… I will be forced to strike out his statement from the record and we will decide the case based on the evidence on record. So it’s your play,” Enrile told Cuevas. Cuevas assured the court that Corona did not try to leave.
“In fact, after he ended his testimony, I did not realize that he was already suffering from chest pain and difficulty in breathing your honor,” Cuevas said. He informed the court that he was already taking medicines for hypoglycemia.
“There is no intention to violate nor to degrade this court, and I take it upon myself…,” he said. But Enrile appeared unconvinced.
“He is the Chief Justice and he knows the decorum and he very well would have said, ‘I am not feeling well, may I be excused from this court? Not to me but the court,” Enrile said.
Again Cuevas reiterated his apology on behalf of his client, who was now seated in a wheelchair next to the witness stand. Corona’s head was bowed and his eyes partly closed as Enrile and Cuevas were in discussion.
Benefit of the doubt
Rep. Sonny Angara, one of the spokesmen for the prosecution, said he wanted to give Corona the benefit of the doubt regarding his actions.
“Let’s give him a benefit of the doubt. He said he was leaving. He’s an old man after all. We’re not doubting his claim of sickness,” he said.
But he said he and the prosecution team want Corona to go back to the witness stand so that they can cross-examine him “as part of the process.”
Interviewed during the lull in the hearing following Corona’s exit, defense lawyer Jose Roy III bluntly denied speculations that Corona’s suddenly falling ill was staged.
“I deny that. That is a lie! This is from people who had prejudged the Chief Justice. This is from the people that said he would invoke his right to remain silent, the same liars who said he was leaving…This is a continuing black propaganda… you in the media should be mature enough to discern what we call the bull from the meat. We are tired of all these insinuations that everything here is a show,” he said. “Based on what the Chief Justice said, the real show is put on by the prosecutors who launched the case without any evidence. That was the show,” Roy said.
Private prosecutor Jose Justiniano said the prosecution would be prompted to ask the impeachment court to strike out the statements made by Corona if won’t come back for cross-examination.
“The defense will have to rest, we have a right to cross-examine the witness. If it (Corona’s opening statement) is treated as a direct testimony, we will have to cross-examine him,” Justiniano said.
On Corona’s dare for the 188 congressmen who signed the impeachment complaint to issue a waiver, Justiniano said he would leave that to the discretion of the congressmen.
“Just ask them. I’m not a congressman. I don’t have a SALN. If I have a bank account, it’s not even confidential,” the lawyer said. “The point here is why did he not declare the dollar accounts in his SALN?”
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - –
RELATED STORY:

Corona may lose case because of ‘walkout’

By Jojo Malig
ABS-CBNnews.com 
MANILA, Philippines (UPDATED) – Chief Justice Renato Corona stands to lose his impeachment case because of his apparent walkout from the Senate session hall Tuesday afternoon, analysts said.
University of Sto. Tomas Faculty of Civil Law Dean Nilo Divina said Corona’s testimony in trying to explain why he did not declare his dollar deposits in his statements of assets, liabilities, and net worth would have been “perfect” if not for his move to suddenly leave the witness stand without permission from the court.
“The testimony and performance would have been brilliant,” he told ANC. “All of these things were lost because of the walkout.”
“We hope that the chief justice allows himself to be cross examined or his statement will be stricken off the record,” Divina said.
“I am afraid for him that the senators will render a judgement against him,” he added.
Political analyst Malou Tiquia echoed Divina’s assessment.
“He already had the upper hand, and suddenly he stood up,” she said.
“Sayang lang yung effort to explain. Sasabihin ng taumbayan ‘o nag-explain ka eh bakit ka tumakbo?’” she added.
She also questioned Corona’s offer of a conditional waiver on the disclosure of his dollar accounts.
“The waiver should have not been conditional,” she said. “If you offer a waiver, it should not be conditional to others.”
Integrated Bar of the Philippines president Roan Libarios agreed.
“Yung lakas ng kanyang testimony was negated by what he did,” he said.
ANC’s Teddy Locsin Jr. said in his “Teditorial” Tuesday night that Corona “snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.”
“Corona had won, and then he lost. He conditioned his own waiver on all 189 (congressmen and Senator Franklin Drilon) signing them all,” he said.
“I understand the overwhelming contempt that Corona felt for the court — presiding justice Enrile’s judicious brilliance notwithstanding — but his walkout destroyed the effect he produced,” Locsin said.
Sudden end
Corona suddenly stood up and left the witness stand after ending his opening statement on day 40 of his trial.
Enrile had to order security to padlock the Senate exit gates, even as Corona’s vehicle was seen parked outside the Senate building exit waiting for the chief justice.
Corona later returned on a wheelchair and his chief legal counsel Serafin Cuevas said his client suddenly experienced low blood sugar or hypoglycemia.
Enrile was left fuming over Corona’s walkout.
He gave the Corona and his defense until Wednesday for the chief justice to be subjected to cross examination.
“He could have excused himself from the court,” he told Cuevas.
“If Corona refuses to be cross examined, senator-judges will decide based only on the evidence that has been presented,” he added.
Enrile stressed that Corona’s testimony will be stricken off the record if he does not allow himself to be cross examined.
Prosecutors also denounced Corona’s apparent walkout, calling it an insult to the impeachment court.
Prosecution spokesperson Rep. Sonny Angara said Corona had long complained about not being given due process but he denied people the chance to ask him questions.
He said Corona’s actions were embarrassing, adding he did not think “he [Corona] would sink this low.”
House Deputy Speaker Lorenzo Tañada III said Corona’s actions were premeditated.
He said the chief justice’s action was a challenge to the impeachment court and an apparent affront to its authority.
Tañada also downplayed Corona’s challenge for 188 congressmen and Senator Franklin Drilon to sign waivers on the disclosure of their assets.
He said congressmen’s statements of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALNs) already have a disclosure waiver.

Filipino Quislings encourage Chinese bullying


May 16, 2012


AS I WRECK THIS CHAIR 
By William M. Esposo 
The Philippine Star
Minister President Vidkun Quisling of Norway with Führer Adolf Hitler of Germany, circa 1942-1945
The term “Quisling” — now evolved to mean traitor — takes its roots from a Norwegian politician, Vidkun Quisling, who openly advocated for Nazi occupation of Norway after his ascension to power in February 1942.
In our current row with China, several Quislings in our midst have been exposed. Many of them are likely unwitting Quislings — meaning that they’re promoting Chinese interest to the detriment of ours without intending to do so. You can spot these Quislings all over mainstream and social media. They represent several counterproductive mindsets.
Some are jeopardizing our national interest because they simply happen to be P-Noy (President Noynoy Aquino) haters and they see in this row over Panatag Shoal an opportunity to bash the president that they failed to defeat in the 2010 elections. At a time when all Filipinos should be rallying behind their president, they would rather encourage Chinese aggression by demonstrating our disunity.
One P-Noy hater even gloated that the US, our principal backer, is not even involved in UNCLOS. So what! Others were moaning the loss of Chinese tourists and trade. So what! Do we surrender Philippine sovereignty for tourists and trade?
The US has no legal right to interfere in the China-Philippine row over Panatag Shoal but their commitments under the Philippine-US Mutual Defense Treaty obligates them to support our country when and if China attacks us. US backing is not a matter of whether the US is involved in UNCLOS or not but a matter of US geopolitical objectives, US national interests and maintaining US strategic military supremacy in the region and in the South China Sea.
In a looming US-China conflict that your Chair Wrecker has been writing about for over five years now, American strategic military supremacy requires US presence in the Philippines – the best choke point for controlling sea traffic in the South China Sea, which is one of China’s prime supply routes. There is also the oil and gas in the South China Sea that becomes crucial in a world fast running low on energy.
Both sides have projected this US-China developing conflict years ago. Wars between superpowers don’t develop overnight. They may be triggered by an event like the assassination of the Austrian Archduke that led to World War I — but there would have been no conflict if both sides didn’t plant the seeds for a future war. The overzealous American interest in Mindanao was perceived by China as preparation for a US-China conflict. It’s natural for China to be suspicious of US moves in Mindanao, a Xenophobia that emerged in the Chinese psyche after their harrowing national trauma that started with the 1900 Boxer Rebellion.
Some Quislings are berating the Aquino administration for distancing the government from the globally staged protest actions last week in front of various Chinese embassies. Either the product of a badly informed mind or judgment clouded by hate for P-Noy — these Quislings would have us risk providing China the leverage for claiming that we exacerbated the conflict by sponsoring the rallies. The Aquino government was simply being consistent that it will approach this problem with a diplomatic, if not a legal, solution. The government cannot prevent Filipinos from exercising their right to express their sentiments.
These Quislings cum armchair generals even have the temerity to suggest our foreign policy and military policy in dealing with China. Without US support, we have no military option. Vietnam, a country that defeated the US, saw the need to realign with their former enemy in protecting Vietnam’s claim in the oil and gas rich Spratly Islands. By consistently maintaining a non-aggressive posture, the Philippine government reinforces its position in the community of nations.
We’re pursuing a course of action – diplomacy or an international court of law — where we have a fighting chance. We’re avoiding situations that can provoke China to take custody by brute force of the claimed Panatag Shoal. If agent provocateurs infiltrate these protest rallies against China, leading it to a bloody outcome or inflicting severe damage to Chinese property — China would have gained a pretext for using their military option. Sadly, our pathetic Quislings never thought of these complications. They just want to express their spite for P-Noy.
The South China Morning Post had announced that we impressed the world by standing up to China. Instead of appreciating what our president is doing and giving our leader their full support — these Quislings resort to acts that endanger Filipino interests. During a time when the highest level of patriotism is demanded from every Filipino, we have these Quislings who would rather promote, wittingly or unwittingly, Chinese interests.
In a time of national crisis, we should expect our media editors to exercise better judgment when selecting stories for publication or airing (in the case of broadcast media). Media should be able to screen those inane ventilations of hate against the president that only worsen our country’s position in this row with China.
This row with China should be kept above the level of political maneuverings. Whether we love or hate P-Noy — he’s our president and common sense dictates that we support our president with our unity.
Shakespeare: “Madness in great ones must not unwatched go.”
* * *
Chair Wrecker e-mail and website: macesposo@yahoo.com and www.chairwrecker.com

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

The defense’s debacle


May 16, 2012


View from Malcolm
By Atty. Harry Roque Jr.
Manila Standard Today
The prosecutors in the on-going impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona owe the defense a mountain of gratitude. After all, it was the defense that proved what the prosecutors could not: That the chief justice has dollar deposits in the amount of— at least—$12 million, which he failed to disclose in his Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth.
What on earth was the defense thinking when it called on the Ombudsman as its own witness? Perhaps they thought that the Ombudsman would not honor the subpoena sent to her to testify in the Senate. But why would she ignore such a subpoena when as a retired Supreme Court magistrate, she knows all too well that unlike contempt issued by the courts, a contempt imposed by the legislature may be for a lifetime. Did they think that the Ombudsman would not disclose details of her ongoing investigation, or at least not the documents tending to show the existence of the CJ’s dollar deposits, because to disclose these would be to violate the existing law protecting the confidentiality of dollar deposits without a court order?
But why would the Ombudsman not disclose this? To begin with, the secrecy of dollar deposits is only provided for by a law, while the duty of the Ombudsman to “investigate public official” for “illegal, unjust, improper, or inefficient” acts and its power to “request any government agency for assistance and information necessary x x x and to examine, if necessary, pertinent records and documents” are both provided for by the Constitution. Pursuant to the principle of hierarchy of laws, the Constitutional provisions on the Ombudsman prevail over the prohibition of the FCDU law.
What makes the defense act even more perplexing is that from the declarations of the Ombudsman herself, she apparently had no intention of taking the stand in the ongoing trial. When asked by Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago to what purpose the Ombudsman could investigate an impeachable officer such as the CJ, the Ombudsman responded that is was only for the purpose of “recommending to Congress the filing of an impeachment complaint after the one-year ban in December of this year.” Ergo, her investigation, if warranted, would have resulted only in a letter to the Speaker of the House perhaps recommending a second impeachment proceeding against the chief justice. This implies that she did not see taking the stand as an option.
So the question is: Why did they do it?
Lawyer Jose Roy III said it was upon the express order of Corona himself, to know what the Ombudsman has. I guess the defense achieved its purpose—except that in the process, they crucified their client.
The defense, after realizing that the Ombudsman dropped a bomb shell against the chief justice, is now saying that the information divulged are: one, not accurate, because the amounts were not verified by the Ombudsman herself; and two, in any case, illegally obtained and hence inadmissible.
Such are admirable attempts to contain the consequences of their self-inflicted damage. But these are utterly bereft of merit. To begin with, the Ombudsman divulged the documents only insofar as it forms part of her ongoing investigation about an alleged dollar deposit undeclared by the chief justice in his SALN. Certainly, this was what complainants Rissa Hontiveros-Baraquel et al alleged in their complaint. Moreover, although she has not personally verified the accuracy of the accounts, she is still entitled to presume that a very specialized agency such as the Anti-Money Laundering Council would be discharging its functions regularly. If at all, the AMLC cannot be faulted for heeding the constitutionally mandated power of the Ombudsman to solicit its assistance. Instead, it should perhaps be faulted for not conducting its own investigation even before the impeachment trial.
Moreover, the chief justice himself, in the form prescribed for the SALN, has expressly authorized the “ obtain and secure from all appropriate government agencies, x x x such documents that may show my assets, liabilities, net worth, business interests and financial connections.” How can he now complain about the acts of the Ombudsman?
With the testimony of the Ombudsman, Corona has put the last nail in his own coffin. Ironically, we have the defense to thank for this.
(Published in the Manila Standard Today newspaper on /2012/May/17)