Showing posts with label Ed Panlilio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ed Panlilio. Show all posts

Friday, July 31, 2009

Penniless Priest for President

by Fr. Shay Cullen
from PREDA Foundation

Is he a priest, prophet or president-to-be? These are the questions that are surrounding the public announcement by Pampanga governor, Father Eddie Panlilio that he will seek the Presidency of the Philippines, “if the support is there”, says this penniless priest-on-leave turned politician. He won an extremely popular mandate as governor of Pampanga in 2007 in a phenomenal election that narrowly dethroned the bid of the powerful Pineda family clan, a close ally of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, who is also from the province. The defeated clan leader Lillia Pineda deposited four million pesos to the election commission as fee for a recount to unseat Governor Panlilio despite the fact that he has only 11 months left in office.

The decision of the highly-respected priest, known affectionally as “Among Ed”, who was suspended from his priestly duties as social action director of the San Fernando Archdiocese when he ran for governor, is very courageous. He entered the political arena as a means to bring the Church’s moral and social teaching to bear on the corrupt-ridden province.

”It was not a failing of Among Ed’s priestly ministry or that of the Church that allowed evil and abominable practices to prevail but because of corrupt unscrupulous politicians”, said a close supporter of the governor who asked not to be named for this article. He was referring to the politically approved and spread of the sex industry and illegal gambling. The city of San Fernando and Angeles city and surrounding towns are flooded with trafficked and prostituted women and children, some as young as 11 years old.

The widespread availability of child pornography, cyber sex dens and foreign sex tourists that are embraced and feted as economic saviors has shocked the good people of Pampanga. “They have turned our beautiful province into a Sodom and Gomorra, money is their God and Among Ed was the only one leading us to stand against it”, he said. They took a stand and elected Father Ed Panlilio as governor whose prized worldly possession is a 1999 model motorbike and an old battered car.

They were not to be disappointed. In his quite unruffled manner he eliminated corruption in the provincial tax collection office and in construction projects and poured the money into education, health and social welfare for the poor. This infuriated the entrenched political lackeys that ruled every town and village and got a share of the largest of the provincial treasury. Abandoned by police protection, pipe welding goons broke into his office in the capitol building and threatened to beat him and his staff to death. Supporters rushed to his side to protect him.

Following his announcement to run for president last 18 July, Archbishop Paciano Aniceto spoke of his deep disappointment and objection at these plans that will require the governor to apply for a dispensation from the priesthood. The archbishop told the media “He is drifting from his original priestly mission. A priest is a servant of the City of God, not of the city of man”.

The church has maintained a strict line of separation between Church and State although progressive bishops have spoken out on politically-sensitive issues such as corruption and social evils, the environmental destruction and irresponsible mining.

The church leaders have been rightly urging the Catholic laity to “evangelize politics” and to make Christian values and social teaching a driving force in national policy. What no one could foresee was that the laity have been taught to trust and respect the clergy so much and they depend on church leadership for so long, they couldn’t but choose a priest to lead them in that evangelical quest.

Are they to be chided or admired for electing this penniless priest and pushing him towards the presidency? This rare uncorrupted man of God who is free of debts to family or party, tycoons and multinationals, church or clergy or any earthly power, is a powerful attraction for many Filipinos that hunger and thirst for social justice and honest government. They want such a candidate to be president. He is the one candidate that is the nightmare of all the rest. END

Visit www.preda.org for more related articles.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

JUETENG - THE PONZI SCHEME IN THE PHILIPPINES

ABS-CBN - ‘Punto por Punto interviewed Mickey Arroyo and Governor Panlilio about “jueteng” and again in “Umaga Kay Ganda.” Governor Panlilio said that if a governor is against jueteng and is supported by the provincial director - then 51% of its operation is solved. If he is supported by the regional police director, 81% is solved. When he is supported by the president, then 100% is solved.

The Governor said that the Philippine National Police has committed a “double failure” in the province when it denied him his right (as the governor) to select a police director and when the Deputy Director Jefferson Soriano, chief of the Directorial staff of the PNP declared Senior Supt. Gil Levin Jr. as the new provincial director who believe that :jueteng” does not exists in the province. The personal choces of the Governor are Col. Cesar Binag and Col.Sonny Cunanan, both are anti-jueteng.

The Philippine National Police and the Department of the Interior and local Government under the Office of the president of the Philippines have disregarded the governor’s right to choose the police provincial director for Pampanga.

Governor Panlilio made 18 request in the past 20 months and all requests were denied!
Lingayen-Dagupan archbishop Oscar Cruz said in an interview on dwIZ radio that that jueteng is rampant not only in Pampanga but also in Luzon and Visayas.

Worse, he said that the jueteng operation appears to be intensifying now in time for the 2010 elections. The prelate made the assessment after the governor complained that jueteng is rampant in Pampanga. He also noted that no less than Michaelangelo Zuce, a nephew of former poll commissioner Virgilio Garcillano had claimed payoffs made to election officials in Mindanao for the 2004 polls came from suspected gambling lord Rodolfo Pineda and wife Lilia.
In the senate, Senator Mar Roxas expressed his support to Gov. Panlilio in his lonely fight against jueteng (a ponzi scheme victimizing the poor). He said,”Akala ng gobyernong Arroyo
na madadala tayo sa ningas-cogon nitong kilos laban sa mga jueteng (The Arroyo government thinks we’ll be duped into believing they are sincere in fighting jueteng operators).

Magkamag-anak itong jueteng at mga raket tulad ng mga pre-need plan at double-you-money scheme ng Legacy ni Celso de los Angeles. Lumalaganap ang mga ito dahil pabaya ang gobyerno.(Jueteng and other rackets, like the unfunded pre-need plans and double-your-money schemes of Celso de los Angeles’ Legacy are relatives. These proliferate with the wilful and conscious negligence of the Arroyo government,” he stressed.

Jueteng operations are camouflaged by the Small Town Lottery. STL is very rampant. It’s a very efficient system in hiding jueteng. The Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office which owns the STL franchise started giving permits to private firms to operate the STL in 2004 is the study and conclusion made by the Pampanga Anti-Gambling Councils. ABS-CBN

Monday, March 23, 2009

GROUP URGES PANLILIO, PADACA TO RUN FOR TOP POSTS

Manila Times
March 23, 2009


Several groups are forming a coalition to push Governors Eduardo Panlililio of Pampanga and Grace Padacá of Isabela to run for president and vice president in the 2010 national elections.

During the weekly media forum Balitaan sa Tinapayan, running priest Fr. Robert Reyes, lawyer Eireene Aguila of Kaya Natin Movement, Philippine Alliance of Ex-Seminarians (PAX) and the farmers’ group PAKIKISAMA expressed support on the Panlilio-Padacá Tandem. They added that they have had enough of traditional politicians.

But the group has not yet determined which of the two governors should run for president. For now they just want the two on a national ticket for the top-two posts.

Although the group has no name yet for the movement, Aguila said they would be meeting this week with various organizations that shares their vision of a corruption-free Philippines.

“We are here because we believe that the time for change is now,” she added. “We believe that Governors Panlilio and Padacá could lead the country.”

Aguila is also the moderator of graceamong.thebetterchoic@gmail.com, an email address urging the people support to the two governors in the next national elections.

In an open letter by Aguila, she said Filipinos deserve better options for their top leaders.

“We believe that Filipinos are not stupid—not bobo,” she wrote in the open letter. “Given the chance to vote for leaders who have an uncompromising stand against graft, make the most use of our scarce and limited resources, not for personal gain but to deliver services needed by the people; [possess the] political will to make difficult and unpopular yet much-needed decisions for the good of the country; will not coddle and protect the corrupt consistently embody ethical principles; practice good governance and endeavor to be effective public servants; have a heart genuinely for the people, we Filipinos will go out and vote—and vote wisely. Given the chance, we will do what is right.”

Showing support

Aguila explained that her group is starting the movement to let the two governors know that they have the support of Filipinos—not only those in their respective provinces. “I’ve only e-mailed [the open letter] last Wednesday, and I’ve already received around 400 replies.”

She and Reyes said critics have told them that they were “dreaming” about having Panlilio and Padacá run for the top-two posts next year. “But we are dreaming with ours eyes wide open,” Aguila said, echoing a similar statement by Reyes.

Reyes, who is famous for running as a means of political protest, added that the time is ripe for national leaders who are morally upright, rather than those who are skilled.

“Ang mabuting leader is values-centered and is principle-driven while ang magaling is magaling manakot, mangurakot, magsi­nunga­ling, etc. [A moral leader is values-centered and is principle-driven, while skilled leaders are good at threatening people, corruption, lying, etc.],” he said.

He added that the group would be putting up a website to be called “Piso at Pangalan para sa Pagbabago [Peso and Name for Change],” where people can offer support for the two governors.

Panlilio is only in his first term as governor, while Padacá is finishing up her third and last term.

Panlilio told The Manila Times that he is still considering his options for 2010, although he had said earlier that his preference would be to return to priesthood.

Good for democracy

Malacañang, meanwhile, welcomed the reported plan by Panlilio to run in the 2010 presidential elections, adding it is “good for our democracy.”

Press Secretary Cerge Remonde said in a state-run radio interview Sunday that Panlilio’s entry to the 2010 race would give people more choices and the priest-turned-governor could even get the Palace backing in case he runs.

“In politics everything is possible. But for Malacañang to endorse him, he will have to jibe with the vision and programs of President [Gloria] Arroyo,” Remonde added.

And to get the Palace endorsement, the secretary said Panlilio must have “proven” capability, competence and integrity.

Panlilio won in the 2007 gubernatorial elections in Pampanga, President Arroyo’s home province, beating the President’s political allies there.

Also in the same year, Panlilio bared receiving a P500,000 cash “gift” to governors from Malacañang at the height of an impeachment bid against Mrs. Arroyo.

The governor recently accused President Arroyo’s son, Pam­panga Rep. Juan Miguel “Mikey” Arroyo, of turning a blind eye to the rampant jueteng operations in his province.

His relationship with Pampanga local officials, majority of whom are President Arroyo’s allies, has been strained because of his anti-corruption programs.

Recent efforts to recall the governor have been linked to Representative Arroyo, who denied the allegations.
-- Ruben D. Manahan 4th And Angelo S. Samonte

Monday, July 21, 2008

The Evil Called Jueteng

by Among Ed Panlilio
Source: www.amonged.org

What is Jueteng?

Jueteng is a game of chance is the form of an illegal numbers game. It is fundamentally playing with numbers that is prohibited by law. There is a regular set of numbers which can be combined in so many ways as 'dreamt' 'interpreted' 'felt' – or in any similar way determined such as through simple 'kursonada' by the bettor. This then places money on his/her chosen numbers. The amount won depends on the amount of the bet made.

What is basically wrong with Jueteng?

There are very disturbing facts about it. 1. It is mostly poor people who play so their little money is gambled away. 2. There are very few 'winners' compared to the thousands of bettors. 3. Only about 15% of every peso is given as prizes, with the remaining 85% remaining the portion mostly destined for the pockets of the Jueteng operators. 4. The numbers which win are drawn with neither fixed nor regulated norms, but with deceit or misdeed, if not determined simply through the mental choice of the operators. 5. The criminal syndication of this supposedly 'lowly' game of the poor and simple tao is now in the hands of hierarchically organized operators.

Is Jueteng morally evil?

Yes, betting in Jueteng is morally evil for the following reasons, 1. Hard earned small amounts of money destined to sustain life are wasted in gambling. 2. little and continuous betting amounts to a large amount of money lost not only to the bettor but to their families. This can cause bitter domestic quarrels and lead to broken families. 3. Playing Jueteng which could have started as a little pastime or a matter of curiosity becomes a vice which is sinful.

Does Jueteng offer anything good in return?

No. Regular betting in Jueteng is a waste of hard earned and much needed money. We work, we sweat, we earn to support our families, send children to school and set aside some money for the future.

Jueteng as with any gambling does not generate wealth but sucks in money from the hands of the gullible. Jueteng does not really provide 'work' to its collectors ('cobradores') heads ('cabos') and others involved.Jueteng results in indulgent and indolent living for those at the top and does not involve real work that is hard, honest and decent. In the eyes of hard working people there is no honor in being a gambling lord, a Jueteng purveyor or aficionados

How widespread is Jueteng?

In 1992 the Bishops of Northen Luzon wrote a joint pastoral letter about Jueteng. In it they commented on the rampant and widespread proliferation of Jueteng from the cities and big towns to the barrios and sitios. They noted their concern that there was no place in their Region that was Jueteng free. What was true in Northern Luzon could not be false in other parts of the country – Luzon as a whole and the Visayas. In Mindanao another form of illegal game is played – 'Masiao'.

Why is Jueteng a social evil?

Jueteng which is widespread in its coverage, rampant in its operation and pervasive in its patronage is a serious social evil. It is illegal in itself, thus criminal in nature and disturbs peace and order in communities. The poor bettors become poorer while the wealthy operators – commonly known as 'gambling lords' become wealthier, more powerful, influential and thus more corrupt and corrupting.

What are the evils arising from Jueteng?

The evils of Jueteng do not arise simply because it is evil. It is evil because it gives rise to the following 1. It helps to destroy the moral imperative of industry and gives rise to the vice of indolence. 2. It promotes the mentality of chance and the culture of dependence. 3. It manipulates the poor, encouraging them to part with their money, luring them with quick returns. 4. it offers bad example to youth who at an early age can be enticed to gambling. 5. It contributes to corruption among public officials for their silence and police authorities for their protection. 6. It deceives people by appearing as a small but innocent pastime of people – hiding the fact that it is a well organized big syndicate from local to regional to national level.7. It is also deceptive in presenting itself as a benevolent and helpful donor – giving money to charitable institutions including church projects.

How does Jueteng promote graft and corruption?

Graft means payoffs, bribes, hush money and the like with one final aim to make public officials and /or police authorities act exactly counter to their sworn duties and obligations. This in turn leads to their corruption. For its continued existence, continuity and territorial expansion Jueteng uses money to promote graft and corruption in public offices, such offices which should be public trusts thus become public liabilities.

Besides promoting graft and corruption what other negative social effects does Jueteng have in society?

Jueteng does not promote peace and order. It breeds goons. It provides guns. It buys people. It promotes stealing and dishonesty. It feeds avarice and greed. It sucks in fortunes. It degrades people. It destroys families.

Jueteng does not bring economic prosperity to people. Those who prosper from it are the purveyors and their cohorts, corrupt public officals and authorities. Jueteng is a source of shame and dishonor to the community where it is played. It is a big liability to the country where it thrives.

Jueteng does not produce industrious and productive people, nor a proud nation. Illegal numbers games are a sign of weak and indolent people and a corrupt and dependent country. Where illegality is practically the rule, criminality and injustice are the order of the day blocking off the hope of a promising future.

Can Jueteng be eradicated?

Yes, but only if public officials and police authorities wish this to happen.

What can the community do to eradicate Jueteng?

They can cooperate with and support public officials and police authorities who are determined to do away with this social plague.

What can individuals do to eradicate Jueteng?

Primarily, individuals can help by not placing their bets. Without bettors, jueteng cannot prosper.

(PAGC - Pampanga Anti-Gambling Council, Inc.)

Friday, December 28, 2007

Speech of Gov. Ed Panlilio at Ateneo de Manila University

Eight hours from now, I will be speaking before a similar audience
at De La Salle University.

I know what you are thinking. You got first dibs at the governor of
Pampanga, and for that alone, the eagle has soared over the archer
once again. "Tuloy", I am tempted to shout, FABILIOH!

By the way, I gave a talk in UP last week, so that probably settles
the implied question.

Beyond your deep-rooted and far-reaching rivalry, I am grateful to
you for giving me a forum to communicate the moral crusade in Pampanga. I
hope that the campus communities will respond positively and become an active
partner in the renewal that we all desire for our country.

You invited me to share with you my experience in responding to the
call of leadership in a time of crisis. I would prefer to rephrase it as a
response to a crisis in leadership. In order to make it clearer to you,
allow me to begin with a bit of an overview of the social and political
situation in Pampanga a few months before the elections.

Lilia Pineda, more casually called Nanay Baby, (nanay na, baby pa.
trust the Filipino to be that family oriented) broke into the turf of the
Lapid father and son when she began a series of so-called consultations with the
people, asking them two questions: first, if their lot has improved with the
ascent of the incumbent governor, Mark Lapid. The answer of course, was
quite obvious, leading to the second question, if they have an alternative
leader they would want to take over the governorship. The answer was
equally undeniable. Equipped with more than adequate resources, she covered
the whole province, practically running a roadshow of grassroots
building.

There was talk that Pineda, then a board member of the Sangguniang
Panlalawigan and the wife of Bong Pineda (who is quite notorious, I
mean, famous in his own right throughout Regions One to Five), decided to
face Mark Lapid head on in the coming elections because the governor
chose Con Laus, the son of a local businessman, over her own son, who was the
mayor of Lubao town. To make matters worse for the father of the province,
Pineda ally and Vice Governor Joseller Guiao filed a case against him,
alleging graft and corruption in the supervision and collection of quarry
taxes.

The stage therefore was set for a grand battle between the two
political giants of Pampanga. Every media pundit and sari-sari store istambay
were expecting a drawn out war of attrition, where no prisoners will be
taken and no resources will be spared. A senior citizen described it with a
mixture of expectation and dread, saying, "*muran pera king kampanya*," or
that it will rain money during the campaign. So many of the poverty-
stricken in the province excitedly awaited the coming of the usual generosity,
commonly experienced every three years, but only this time it will come like
wave after wave of blessings. It was often said that it is only during
this period that the poor get the attention and assistance they deserve,
so they better make the most of it by playing one side against the other,
conceding to the highest bidder, as it were. Many among the Kapampangans,
however, were disconsolate at the prospect of having to choose between two
candidates they did not like. A good many of them have decided that early to
leave blank the space for governor in their ballots.

Before this backdrop, a group of people, a priest and some
seminarians among them (no, I was not the priest) regretted the state of affairs that
their province was in. If only to express a statement to the world that
Pampanga is not bereft of good leadership, they decided to gather more of
their like-minded friends and begin to search for an alternative
candidate. Enough is enough, they said, the pride of the Kapampangan is at stake here.
And if you know us, then you should also know that our kayabangan is
legendary.

And so began the series of consultations in search of a candidate
with the moral ground, the resources and the acceptability, who will stand as
a symbol for the Kapampangan dignity and conscience.

We had a great difficulty in searching for that candidate. It even
dawned on us that we might have been too idealistic, too far removed from
reality. Either our prospect could not measure up to our criteria, or he
would not be willing to get entangled between two battling giants. "The election
result is already common knowledge," one of them said, conceding to the
strength of one of the candidates, although I will not say who SHE is.

In the midst of this desperation, one seminarian turned to me and
asked, "what about you?" My immediate and emphatic answer was, "no way!"
My heart and mind was then running on hierarchical fuel. It was never an
option for a Kapampangan priest to run for office in any previous election.
Kapampangans being such a pious people, they revere their priests to a fault,
conceding to them a spiritual leadership that excluded political power.

Like any other Filipino, Kapampangans live with a compartmentalized
sense of morality. Our churches are filled every Sunday, but our jueteng
industry is equally robust. We declare ourselves *cerrado catolico*, but we do
not pay our taxes honestly. Our cars and jeepneys are festooned with images
and pictures of the crucified Christ and the Virgin Mother, but they are
not powerful enough to remind us to obey traffic laws. Thus, what place
is there for a priest to enter the secular world of politics?

The idea of a priest running for the governorship snowballed among
the people of conscience who have begun to call themselves the Third
Force. Slowly, my outright refusal gave way to sober reflection as I thought of the
people being under the yoke of patronage, and for how long, since we all
know how easily political dynasties can take root and flourish. I looked
back at my past to find a ground and a horizon for my final decision.

Even as a seminarian, I have intently dedicated my life for the
uplift of the marginalized and the weak, and this had continued in my
parochial and archdiocesan work. Thankfully, I was assigned later to direct the
Social Action Center of Pampanga, more popularly known as SACOP. This
enabled me to delve more deeply into the plight of the masses and be exposed to
their needs and aspirations, and more importantly, to identify with their
situation. Thus, I made it a personal choice to live a simple life
and temper my wants to the more basic necessities, for it would not have
been in consonance with the Gospel had I enjoyed affluence while people
around me were hungry. If they did not eat, I did not eat.

The eruption of Mount Pinatubo allowed me to work more closely with
government and non-government organizations in helping to ease the
plight of the poor and dispossessed. I began to realize that good intentions
were not enough, there must be a working structure that would efficiently and
effectively answer to the needs of the poor. I also learned that I
did not have the answer to all the problems besetting the needy, that there
are others who can creatively contribute to the common pool of knowledge
and wisdom. Thus, it was impressed upon me that I was not a modern-day
Messiah, but rather, a bringer of grace from the Annointed One. On the other
hand, I realized that redemption has its social underpinnings, and that I
join all other people in a journey towards salvation. Having experienced all
these, there came a certain point in my life when I dedicated my priesthood
to the central message of the Gospel of John, that Christ came that man may
have fullness of life in all its dimensions, that we as clerics must not
only feed the soul, but also see to the nourishment of the body and the
mind. I celebrated the sacraments as essential signs of relationship with the
Divine, but encouraged my parishioners to share their graces to the
less fortunate they meet outside the Church. In my own humble way, I
persevered in my vocation and my service to the archdiocese, giving my
obedience to my spiritual fathers, first to Archbishop Oscar Cruz, and then to
Archbishop Aniceto, fostered by my brotherhood with my fellow priests.

Thus, when I finally conceded to become a candidate for governor, it
was in response to a gaping need for moral resurgence in a despairing
province, and in a more personal way, a deepening of my ministerial priesthood.
When Kapampangans of known capability, respected stature and proven worth
would not want to give people an option to choose a better candidate, I
had to stand up for my people. But believe me, I had to spend days of
prayer and feverish consultations before I made my decision. I had to resolve
if this was a genuine desire for good, or a hidden longing for
glorification. Either way, I was made aware of the consequences of my decision. The
reasons for not running were many and equally valid. Not a few friends came and
gave me their advice. I listened. In the end, I had to listen to and obey
what my conscience dictated. My own ministerial priesthood demanded that I
come down from the safety and security of the pulpit and incarnate the Gospel
message in the political world. The Church has been complaining for so long
about graft and corruption, but she was generally being ignored. It would
have seemed that she has lost her moral authority over the considering
that most of the suspected practitioners of graft and corruption came from
Catholic schools themselves, Ateneo included, or probably, Ateneo specially.
It was my belief that the extraordinary situation prevailing in Pampanga at
that time demanded an entirely different and fundamental response. I
took the leap and decided to do something about it hands on. I leapt, and
found that I was not alone. I was joined by men and women of good will who were
willing to take a risk.

I honestly believe that the people who leapt with me, people from
all class and all manners of persuasion were driven by a common desire to see
through a crusade that will realize Gospel values in governance. I do not
deny the fact that Kapampangans are personalistic, more so with their
priests, but be that as it may, I have always explained that the crusade was not
about me, but it was about something bigger than all of us combined. I was
just a part of the whole, as important as the campaign manager, but equally
as indispensable as the poll watcher.

Who were these people of conscience? A classic example would be our
technical consultant on software systems. All his life he had never
voted in any election, or even participated by any means whatsoever. He
was a self-confessed apolitical and fence-sitting Filipino who would just
let political dogs lie, for as long as they leave him in peace. But
when the crusade began, he was convinced by his wife to visit the EDquarters
and offer whatever talent or materials he could contribute to the
furtherance of the campaign. We cannot quantify his involvement in pesos, much less
measure its effects, but because of his free services, we were able
to set up a text brigade, hook up the EDquarters in a wi-fi network, and
more importantly implement an automated quick count system that helped us
track down the results of the elections accurately. Given the fact that as
independent candidate I was not privileged to receive a copy of the
election returns, his help was truly incalculable. What is more notable is
that during an interview, it was found out that he lived next door to a
mayoralty candidate of the City of San Fernando. He could have earned tens of
thousands of pesos, had he offered his services to him. But he chose
to give it to us for free.

Actively involved, too were a dozen former seminarians who were
among the workhorses of the campaign. Collectively known as Bakal Boys, their
background often provided a spiritual dimension in our daily
struggle. Where else would you find a campaign where strategies and tactics were
discussed along with conversion, metanoia and kenosis? Many of them were
influential in my decision to run, being members of the core group that searched
for an alternative candidate. Among the Bakal Boys was one who lived quite
an easy life in Cebu, earning a salary that would be the envy of most single
men of his age and stature. But like Peter, he left everything behind,
leaning on nothing but his faith and his earnest desire to do something good
for our province. He is now a part of my team, involved in a sensitive
position that requires my utmost trust and confidence. Another former
seminarian came all the way from London, where his community produced the very
first U-Tube video in support of my candidacy.

Perhaps it is the presence of the Bakal Boys that allowed us to look
at the ordinary events of the campaign with the eyes of faith. The
confluence of all the events, such as the blessing of good weather in both our
grand miting de avances, the speed at which triumph was achieved, the
mystery of the experts in statistics and probability being confounded by their
own means, all pointed to the hand of God actively involving Himself in
the affairs of man. At every turn, we looked for the sign of His
presence, and we were not disappointed. Ours was not just a moral crusade, it
transformed itself into a divine crusade.

A very palpable sign of God's presence was the full support of
brethren from other faiths and denominations in the crusade for good governance.
Among the first to express their support on the day I filed my certificate
of candidacy were Methodist pastors. Leaders of born again fellowships
also boosted our stock, widening the spectrum of collaboration into
dimensions previously unknown. I believe that there is no other previous
experience in our nation where people of different faiths actively involved and
immersed themselves in a mission as one body. What we were seeing was the
Kingdom of God, a dedicated assembly of people under one dream: to see good
governance become a reality.

Cyrelle was your typical Among Ed volunteer: multi-tasking,
energetic, uncomplaining, except for the fact that she just graduated from a
private elementary school. She was everyone's kid niece or sister, a
favorite object of pranks, but equal to every joke thrown her way. Forsaking
a summer of visiting malls and beaches, she became the ultimate
factotum, preparing coffee, manning the photocopy machine, answering the phone,
encoding data and stapling sheets of paper. Not even four years
social studies in high school would match up to the wealth of hands-on
learning she attained during those months.

And of course, there were those who contributed their time, talent
and treasure from all walks of life and practically from every corner of
the earth. There was this public school teacher who was given a one
thousand peso bribe by another candidate. She took the effort to visit our
EDquarters and turn over the money to us. As fast as people were
taking posters and flyers from our office, equally consistent were the kind
donors who dropped by every day to deliver campaign materials they had
printed on their own. During our motorcades, ordinary people threw coins into
our showboats to share their support. Even non-Kapampangans generously
shared their blessings.

And finally, there was Jomar Nulud, a barangay chairman in my last
parish who was gunned down by still unidentified assailants days after my
proclamation. Kapitan Jomar switched allegiance after he learned of
my candidacy. The night before he was killed, he ominously told me to
be careful. "Hindi baleng ako and itumba, huwag lang ikaw," he said.
His was the ultimate sacrifice. I am nothing compared to him.

A common thread that ran among all of these examples of people who
joined us in our campaign was the element of sacrifice. The Japanese have a
proverb: always replace a thing of value with that of a greater value. In
giving up something of themselves, whether as mundane as a summer vacation, as
abstract as a preconceived notion of a different faith, or as
irreplaceable as a human life, their surrender was for a far greater cause. And
because of this, they gained an ownership of the crusade. This ownership has
been multiplied a thousand times and has reached the puroks and
barangays, but we still need to reach out to a lot more people and convince them to
own this new politics.

Once, I expressed my misgivings to a supporter, rhetorically asking,
What if I got used to all the attention and the glory? What if I started to
enjoy it? What if I started to demand it? Thankfully, I am surrounded by
people whose presence always reminds me that the crusade is a team effort.
Even now, I am not "Gov" to them. I am still "Among Ed," and to the more
familiar, I am "Brods or Jo." I allow this informality, because I
know that I am just one instrument among many volunteers, workers,
contributors, prayer warriors and well-wishers who gave a part of their lives to
realize a vision. It just so happened that my position warrants me to be a
"primus inter pares", a first among equals, or more accurately a father to
sons and daughters who deserve my love, respect and attention, because they
gave so much so freely.

That we have won through a plurality reminds us that we have to be
gentle with our salesmanship. We have to convince the civil society and the
civil service, by way of example and education, that honest governance
works. We have to provide for a transparent, efficient and effective delivery
of services, that the people may pay their taxes with cheerful hearts,
knowing that their hard-earned money does not find itself in some
bureaucrat's pocket. Arriving much sooner than expected, as it were, we are quite
pleased that the Capitol leadership, as well as the rank and file
have for the most part adapted to our program of government quite quickly. I
credit this to the government employee's innate goodness and willingness to
work. I have to admit, though that the adjustment period was quite tenuous.
But when the Governor sets the example in punctuality, simplicity of
lifestyle, openness to the constituents, dedication to work and pleasantness of
disposition, the most taciturn employee has no other recourse than to
follow.

Today, our province earns an average of a million pesos a day in
quarry revenues. Suppliers have lowered their bids dramatically after being
reminded that the days of SOPs are over. A system of fiscal
discipline is being instituted. We have streamlined the manpower to make it more
citizen-oriented. Our primary attention is now given to the
equipment, staffing and development of our provincial and district hospitals.
We are at the moment studying systems and processes that will make quality
service be delivered on time. Capacity and confidence building measures are
being undertaken in order that the bureaucracy can pride itself as a
working and effective body. For the first time in the history of the province,
a draft three-year executive agenda will be submitted to the people tomorrow
for their comments and suggestions, in the spirit of consultation and
collaboration.

But for society to be transformed, it is not enough that government
employees be empowered and motivated. The desire for positive
change and the willingness to sacrifice for the greater good must not only
trickle down, but must engulf every barangay. A visual way of describing the
approach to this objective is that of the way the bibingka is
cooked: heat on top, heat at the bottom. We should inflame the governing and the
governed. The inured system of political patronage and dependency
may take a little more time and may require a more extensive strategy for the
people to realize that in the end, the benefits to the community will outweigh
any personal gain. Good citizenship must take root until following the
law, paying taxes honestly, respecting the environment and upholding one's
dignity shall become second nature to every person.

I don't think that God meant me to endure five seminaries just to
become a Governor or some other public official. I love my vocation, and at
the end of this temporary detour into politics, I shall desire nothing more
than to have my priestly faculties once again, and be a shepherd of the
faith anew. A personal glory shall be that day when I shall hold aloft the
transubstantiated body and blood of Christ, recalling my first mass
after my ordination. It is from this vantage point that I say that I really
do not encourage the entry of priests or ministers to the electoral arena.
It would be utter presumption and even a complete falsehood to maintain
that only the clergy posses the moral superiority to lead the nation. A
layman with the proper motivation and popular support can lead any province
to glory, in the same manner that an elected priest with less than
honorable intentions can bring the province to its knees. Every believer has
a divine mandate to do good and cast out evil. For the sake of the beggar out
in the street, for the sake of the baby who is fed with rice water, for the
sake of the sick patients in our public hospitals, for the sake of every
Filipino who persists in the hope of a brighter horizon, I ask you to help us
prove that we are essentially good, and that we uphold the common good.

It has been said so often that Pampanga right now is a laboratory
mouse in a grand experiment upon which almost every eye of every disillusioned
Filipino is fixed, steadily observing how the dream of good and honest
governance is realized, and if it can result in the improvement of the people's
plight. Historically, our province has always been the breeding ground of social unrest and
revolutionary thought. Once again, there is something revolutionary
going on in Pampanga. With fervent prayers, consultative and exemplary
leadership, participatory and law-abiding citizenship, collaborative and
dedicated service, together with the application of better organizational
systems, technological processes and innovations, I believe that we can
overcome and transform the individual and the society. Then shall our success in
Pampanga be translated in every province of the nation. Let us all
join forces to transform ourselves, and in turn our beloved Philippines.